In a world where corporations clutch at power like a miser hoards gold, Ripple’s XRP Ledger stands as a defiant monument to the absurdity of control. David Schwartz, the CTO Emeritus with a tongue sharper than a Bolshevik’s wit, declares: the XRPL was forged to resist even Ripple’s own grasping hands.
Why Ripple Built a Ledger Even They Can’t Boss Around
On the digital soapbox of platform X, David Schwartz, the man who’d rather wrestle with code than corporate chains, defended the XRP Ledger’s decentralization on Feb. 24. With a flourish of sarcasm, he proclaimed that XRPL was designed to be as untamable as a wild bear in a china shop-even from Ripple itself.
“We crafted this beast,” he quipped, “so that not even we could ride it into the sunset of control. Not because we doubted our genius, mind you, but because the world is a circus, and we didn’t want to be the clowns.”
“We carefully and intentionally designed XRPL so that we could not control it. It’s not because we weren’t 100% confident we were.”
Schwartz, with the gravity of a man explaining why one doesn’t wrestle with pigs, elaborated that this decision was born of legal quagmires and corporate tightropes. “Being a company,” he sighed, “means dancing to the tune of regulators and courts. And let’s face it, even the best dancer can trip on a banana peel of bureaucracy.”
“Ripple, for instance, must bow to U.S. court orders,” he continued, “like a knight to his king. And while I trust U.S. courts as much as I trust a cat with a fish, there’s always the fear they might decide international comity with some oppressive regime trumps XRPL. Better safe than sorry, eh?”
With a wink and a nod, the CTO Emeritus added:
“We absolutely and clearly decided that we DID NOT WANT control. Because, let’s be honest, power corrupts, and we’d rather not be the villains in this blockchain drama.”
Schwartz then drew a line in the sand between trust and tyranny. “Trust me, I love being trusted,” he said, grinning like a fox. “But forcing people to trust me to use XRPL? That’s a recipe for disaster. We wanted XRPL to stand on its own two feet, not on Ripple’s shaky shoulders.”
“So, we built it to be uncontrollable,” he concluded, “because the only way to ensure no one owns it is to make sure no one can. It’s like building a house without a master key-everyone’s safe, and no one’s in charge. Except, of course, the debate rages on about how much Ripple still whispers in its ear.”
FAQ 🧭
- Why did Ripple design XRPL to be uncontrollable?
Because even Ripple knows that absolute power is less fun when you’re the one answering to the lawyers. - How do court orders affect Ripple’s network governance?
Like a stubborn mule, Ripple must obey U.S. courts. By removing control, they’ve ensured the network doesn’t become a legal ping-pong ball. - What does this mean for XRP holders?
Less corporate meddling, more stability. Unless, of course, the market decides to have a tantrum-but that’s another story. - How does XRPL limit corporate influence?
Its consensus model is like a democracy where no one gets to be the dictator. Not even Ripple, much to their feigned disappointment.
Read More
- USD MYR PREDICTION
- USD AUD PREDICTION
- AAVE PREDICTION. AAVE cryptocurrency
- USD CLP PREDICTION
- USD NZD PREDICTION
- USD DKK PREDICTION
- EUR ILS PREDICTION
- USD MXN PREDICTION
- EUR ZAR PREDICTION
- ADA PREDICTION. ADA cryptocurrency
2026-02-26 05:57